Children waiting in line get on an amusement park ride dread the sign that says "You Must Be This Tall to Ride." Particles of light (photons) on their way to break a molecular bond run into a similar problem. Of course, there's no sign on the molecule, but with the laws of physics being what they are there might as well be a sign that says, "You Must Have This Amount of Energy to Break this Bond." Why bother mentioning the obvious fact that there's a threshold level for almost everything? It's no surprise that you must have a minimum amount of money to buy coffee, a minimum amount of space to park your car in, a minimum number of votes to win an election. Here's the difference: adding the energy of two photons doesn't help break the bond any more than two short kids can get on the ride by adding their heights. Two little kids don't count as one big kid and two low energy photons don't count as one high-energy photon. This is why we can stare at green Astroturf for hours during a game with no damage to our eyes whereas a much shorter exposure to the same amount of energy in the form of ultraviolet (UV) light can break chemical bonds in our cells' DNA. Two green photons are harmless even though they carry the same combined energy as the one dangerous UV photon.



It was Albert Einstein who first realized this must be the way nature works. Though in popular thought Einstein's "E=MC^2" tops the charts, he won the Nobel prize for his clever take on a formula first proposed by physicist Max Planck: E=h * frequency. "E" stands for energy and "h" is just a conversion factor similar to the conversion factor we use when we change Dollars to Euros. In the case of light, "h" converts frequency to energy.

As an example, let's calculate the energies of a safe green photon and a dangerous UV photon.

Safe green photon (550 nanometer wavelength):
Frequency =  5.45e+14 cycles per second (frequency is obtained by dividing the speed of light by the wavelength)
h = 6.63e-34 joule-second
Energy = h * frequency = 3.61e-19 joules

Dangerous UV photon  (275 nanometer wavelength):
Frequency =  1.09e+15 cycles per second
h = 6.63e-34 joule-second
Energy = h * frequency = 7.23e-19 joules


What if we asked for a UV photon of the same frequency but with less energy? The answer is: there's no such thing! This answer would have surprised physicists before Einstein who believed that light was a wave. In the wave theory you can reduce the energy of a light wave as much as you want by lowering the amplitude (height) of the wave, whereas in the particle theory, the energy of a single photon—given by E=h * frequency—is the minimum amount of energy that a light beam of that frequency can have. Moreover, you can only increase the beam energy by adding another photon, so the beam energy can only increase in steps. Einstein's interpretation of the equation "E = h * frequency" played a major part in the revolution in physics that we now call quantum theory. The first physicist to state the famous formula, Max Planck, discovered that a model which treats light as though it came in discrete bundles of energy agreed with experimental observations that the wave theory of light couldn't explain. Einstein's view was that there is no "as though" about it, the equation is telling it as it is, and light actually does come in bundles whose energy is given by E= h * frequency. Same equation, different ways of seeing what it means.

It's a fair question to ask why we still use terms like "wavelength" if we now know that light is a particle. This isn't just a historical leftover or a matter of hard-to-discard tradition. Quantum theory involves probability calculations with wavelike expressions as an essential feature. But the wavelike nature is a characteristic of the quantum probabilities not of the photon per se. Because when it comes to interacting with matter—say, a high energy UV photon interacting with a strand of DNA—light acts like a particle not a wave: the molecular bond is immediately broken as though it got hit by tiny rock.



Health science is among the numerous applications benefiting from the particle theory of light. For example we already mentioned that a green photon at 550 nanometer wavelength is eye-safe whereas a UV photon at 275 nanometers is not, but what about photons with in-between energies? Can they interfere with the normal chemistry of the eye? The 400-500 nanometer wavelength range (violet to blue) is known as high-energy visible (HEV) light, and some experts have eye health concerns regarding this part of the visible spectrum. Exposure to high intensity light in this wavelength range has caused eye damage in laboratory animals, suggesting the possibility that long term exposure to lower levels of HEV could be harmful to human eyes. If so, the explanation of the causes will depend on the imagined "You Must Have This Amount of Energy to Break this Bond" sign on the biological molecules involved.


Ari Siletz is president of CCDMETRIX. His company specializes in automated vision system inspection and metrology. With a background in both optical and software engineering, Ari has been developing instruments for the the ophthalmic and optical coating industries since the 1980s. Writing is one of Ari's serious hobbies. He is a published author whose short stories have appeared in numerous literary anthologies. He lives in Sebastopol, California.