Impact of Visual
Impairment on Self-reported Visual Functioning in Latinos: The Los Angeles
Latino Eye Study
Researchers at the Doheny Eye Institute and the Department of Ophthalmology
of the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los
Angeles, formulated the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study (LALES), a population-based
assessment of the prevalence of visual impairment, ocular disease and
visual functioning in Latinos. The Department of Pharmaceutical Economics
and Policy at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, assessed
the association between presenting binocular visual acuity (VA) and self-reported
visual function as measured by the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual
Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) in individuals eligible for the LALES.
A total of 6,357 Latinos (out of 7,789 eligible individuals) aged 40 and
older from six census tracts in Los Angeles were included the LALES. All
participants completed a standardized interview, including the NEI-VFQ-25
to measure visual functioning, and a detailed eye examination. Two definitions
of visual impairment were used: presenting binocular distance visual acuity
(VA) of 20/40 or worse; and presenting binocular distance VA worse than
20/40. Analysis of variance was used to determine any systematic differences
in mean NEI-VFQ-25 scores by visual impairment. Regression analyses were
completed to determine the association of age, gender, number of systemic
comorbidities, depression and VA with self-reported visual function and
to estimate a visual impairment-related difference for each subscale based
on differences in VA.
Of the 5,287 LALES participants with complete NEI-VFQ-25 data, 6.3 percent
(including 20/40) and 4.2 percent (excluding 20/40) were visually impaired.
In the visually impaired participants, the NEI-VFQ-25 subscale scores
ranged from 46.2 (General Health) to 93.8 (Color Vision). In the regression
model, only VA, depression and number of comorbidities were significantly
associated with all subscale scores (R(2) ranged from 0.09 for Ocular
Pain to 0.33 for the composite score). For nine of 11 subscales, a five-point
change was equivalent to a one- or two-line difference in VA. Relationships
were similar, regardless of the definition of visual impairment.
Results showed that the NEI-VFQ-25 was sensitive to differences in VA.
A five-point difference on the NEI-VFQ-25 seems to be a minimal criterion
for a visual impairment-related difference. Self-reported visual function
is essentially unchanged if the definition of visual impairment includes
or excludes a VA of 20/40.
|