Use of Contact Lenses in the Visual Correction of Keratoconus
Use of Contact Lenses in the Visual Correction of Keratoconus
By Alex Cannella, RN, FCLSA
Release Date: |
April 2009 |
Expiration Date: |
January 24, 2010 |
Learning Objectives: |
Upon completion of this program, the participant should be able to:
-
Recognize characteristics of keratoconus.
-
Differentiate the progressive stages of the condition.
-
Identify the different cone types.
-
Specify the best contact lens to achieve vision correction.
|
Faculty/Editorial Board: |
Written when Mr. Canella was Canella International
Professional Services Manager for Polymer
Technology, the maker of the BOSTON RGP materials
and solutions. Cannella is trained as a Registered
Nurse and is certified by the NCLE in contact lens
fitting. He is a "fellow" member of the Contact
Lens Society of America and has more than 10
years of contact fitting experience. |
Credit Statement: |
This course is approved for one (1) hour of CE credit by National Contact Lens Examiners (NCLE). Course #CTWJMI200-2 |
This CE course celebrates 20/20 Magazine as the exclusive provider of online CE courses to the Opticians Association of America. |
|
|
Keratoconus is an ocular disorder characterized by progressive
corneal thinning and other corneal sequelae, in which the cornea
assumes an irregular conical shape. It can be classified according to
degree of conicity and characterized morphologically by the shape
of the cone. Although early keratoconus with minimal irregular corneal
astigmatism may be corrected by spectacles, they cannot be expected to improve visual acuity to the same extent that rigid contact
lenses offer, when irregular astigmatism is present or increases.
DIAGNOSIS
Since the onset of this
disorder usually
occurs in the second
decade of life, these
patients are active
occupationally, socially and recreationally.
Therefore demands
for good visual acuity
among these patients,
is a major concern for
both the practitioner
and the patient. Keratoconus quite often
typically progresses
for a period of five to
seven years at a variable rate. The end
point of this progression may range from slight corneal irregularity
to severe distortion of the corneal contour and apical scarring.
Some of these cases require surgical keratoplastic intervention if
the patient cannot achieve acceptable vision with spectacles or is
unable to tolerate contact lenses. The most practitioners can do
for these patients is offer the best visual acuity possible until this
condition reaches some point of remission or until surgical intervention is required.
Since the introduction of photokeratoscopy and, most recently,
corneal molding, much has been learned regarding the corneal
topographical changes the cornea undergoes during the early stages of keratoconus.
- The inferior portion of the cornea steepens.
- The corneal apex steepens and assumes an oblique to "against-the rule" astigmatic configuration.
- The superior cornea (above the horizontal midline)
As this condition progresses, the curvature of the corneal apex
becomes more elongated and the corneal surface bulges more
creating increased irregular astigmatism. For these reasons, acceptable visual acuity with eyeglasses becomes increasingly impossible.
Soft lenses, due to their flexible nature and limited ability to correct corneal astigmatism, do not provide the degree of visual acuity
these young, active patients require to function in their daily lives.
By their physical nature, rigid contact lenses offer the best vehicle
for providing very good visual acuity to these patients, until their
condition reaches a point of remission or until surgical intervention is indicated. These patients typically become more dependent on their rigid contact lenses for day and night time vision correction. It is therefore imperative to maximize lens-wearing comfort
for the patient. Because of the prolonged wearing periods, it is also
critical to protect the already compromised integrity of the corneal
physiology. The use of gas permeable lens materials offering high
oxygen transmissibility is extremely important.
Because of the limited and often inaccurate information provided
by keratometry, keratoconus lens fitting dictates that diagnostic
lenses are used to achieve the best possible fit.
CLASSIFICATION
Mild cones may be classified as having keratometry ("K") readings
in both meridians of <48.00 diopters, moderate cones having "K"
readings of 48.00 to 54.00 diopters and severe cones as having "K"
readings of >54.00 diopters. Since the superior portion of the cornea
is relatively normal, it is an important consideration when selecting
a lens base curve to avoid impingement in this area.
IDENTIFICATION OF CONE TYPE
It is also helpful for the fitter to be able to identify the shape and
size of the cone they are dealing with, to be able to help assist with
diagnostic lens selection, minimize the amount of lens parameter
changes and subsequent chair-time involved in fitting these cases.
The contact lens fitter can determine the type and size of the cone
in one of several ways. Following dilation of the pupils, the "Red
reflex" can be used to retro illuminate the cornea and determine the
shape and approximate size of the cone. A more direct approach is
to place a flat-fitting lens on the eye and view the outline produced
by the flat fitting relationship as viewed using sodium fluorescein.

- <5mm for "nipple" cones—usually located at or near the center
of the corneal apex.
- 5mm to 6mm for "oval" cones. These cones are typically large in
size and ellipsoidal in shape. They are located predominantly inferior-temporally and appear to sag due to their larger horizontal dimension.
- >6mm for "globus" cones—these cones appear more diffuse
and are of larger size. They may extend above the horizontal mid-line of the cornea. As progression of the disease is noted and corneal
thinning continues, Fleischers ring hydrops, positive Munsons Sigh
striae and central scarring are among the signs that may be seen.
RIGID LENS FITTING
While keratoconus can present numerous lens-fitting difficulties,
these can be minimized if a disciplined approach to lens fitting is
used. In the early stages of this condition, use of rigid spherical
and aspheric lenses employing steep base curves, standard designs
and average lens diameters will function very well to provide good
patient comfort and very good visual acuity.
As the disease progresses, fitting moderate to severe keratoconus
requires more attention to identifying the size and shape of the cor-neal aberration. As stated previously, use of diagnostic lenses is the
only sure method to achieve an optimal lens fitting relationship.
Basic lens design requirements dictate that lenses provide steep base
curves, relatively small posterior optical zones and flat peripheral
curves. There are several design systems that meet these criteria.
MCGUIRE CONE LENS DESIGN
The McGuire fitting philosophy indicates a "three-point touch"
fitting system. The goal is to achieve superior alignment between
the cornea and the lens. The ideal fit appearance will exhibit 2mm
to 4mm of "feather" apical bearing, with slight edge lift inferiority.
Attempts to vault the corneal apex to reduce inferior edge lift will
result in an excessively steep fitting relationship on the more normal
superior portion of the cornea.
The fitting system consists of three separate diagnostic lens sets
specifically designed for each type of cone configuration. The
design is predicated on the lens optical zone size as it relates to the
size of the cone varying form 6mm for the nipple-type cones to
6.5mm for oval cones and 7mm for globus cones. Each incorporates
identical peripheral curve systems blended together to resemble an
aspheric-like flattening in the posterior lens periphery. Four
peripheral curves are utilized:
- -0.5mm flatter than the base curve
- -1.5mm flatter than the base curve
- -3.0mm flatter than the base curve
- -5.0mm flatter than the base curve
Soper Keratoconus Design
The Soper keratoconus design utilizes 10 base curves and standard
optical zones sizes identified by degree of cone severity. Letters
identifies these lenses. They indicate the type of cone for which
they might be suited. The system recommends vaulting the cor-neal apex. The theory behind this fitting system (Korb, et al) postulates that apical bearing should not be used because of the possibility of corneal complications including abrasions and
accelerated corneal scarring.
- Mild — (A, B, C, D) less than 48 diopters in either corneal meridian.
- Moderate — (E, F, G) 48 to 54 diopters in either corneal
meridian.
- Advanced — (H, I, J) >54 diopters in either corneal meridian.
The difference in this fitting system is that overall lens diameter
and base curve radius is changed to increase or decrease lens sagittal depth, thereby allowing this design to be used in fitting a range
of corneal steepness. Letters to signify which type of cone each
would fit identifies lenses.
ASPHERIC RIGID LENS DESIGNS
In keratoconus, aspheric designs have proven to not only fit the
varied corneal shapes, but also simplify the fitting process by eliminating some of the variables involved with lens design and fitting.
These designs provide improved mid-peripheral alignment as compared to spherical designs. Optical zone sizes are generally small
but will usually accommodate the larger globus cones as well as
oval or nipple-type ones.
Several of these aspheric designs are also "junctionless." That is,
the design has been mathematically calculated to allow the various
aspheric curves to be joined in a matter in which no junctions are
created. This helps to eliminate narrow bearing areas in the mid-periphery, allows lens mass to be distributed more evenly, creating
a more uniform tear layer profile under the lens.
OTHER CONTACT LENS OPTIONS
Other means of fitting the keratoconic patient have also been utilized.
A "piggyback" fitting systems has been used in cases where corneal
contact lenses will not suitably stabilize on the cornea, where rigid lens
wear alone is not tolerated by the patient or metabolic problems exist.
Using this technique, the patient is first fitted with a large, thin soft
lens in the conventional manner, so that both good lens centration
and movement are achieved. Once the patient has adapted to full-time soft lens wear, keratometry readings are taken of this "renewed"
corneal surface and rigid lens diagnostic fitting is carried out. Use of
high-permeability rigid lens materials, designed as thin as possible is
essential, since the patient is wearing a "double layer" of lenses on the
cornea and the physiology is already impaired. The disadvantage of
this system is that the patient must contend with insertion, handling
and caring for both types of lenses separately. Use of separate care
systems is also costly and time-consuming.
Another option is the use of a hybrid lens such as the SoftPerm
lens. The advantage of this system is that the soft lens and gas permeable lenses are polymerized together into one unit.
Consideration must be given to the physiological impact that
these fitting systems may have on the cornea with regard to providing adequate oxygen.
When talking to patients, consider the following, "republished with permission of AllAboutVision.com." This material was updated Dec. 2008.
KERATOCONUS By Gretchyn Bailey and Judith Lee; additional contributions and review by Gary Heiting, OD
Often appearing in the teens or early twenties, keratoconus is a progressive eye disease in which the normally round
cornea thins and begins to bulge into a cone-like shape. This cone shape deflects light as it enters the eye on its way
to the light-sensitive retina, causing distorted vision. Keratoconus can occur in one or both eyes.
Keratoconus Symptoms and Signs
Keratoconus can be difficult to detect, because it usually
develops so slowly. However, in some cases, it may proceed
rapidly. As the cornea becomes more irregular in shape, it
causes progressive nearsightedness and irregular astigmatism
to develop, creating additional problems with distorted and
blurred vision. Glare and light sensitivity also may be noticed.
Keratoconic patients often have prescription changes every
time they visit their eye care practitioner. Its not unusual to
have a delayed diagnosis of keratoconus, if the practitioner is
not familiar with the early-stage symptoms of the disease.
What Causes Keratoconus?
New research suggests the weakening of the corneal tissue
that leads to keratoconus may be due to an imbalance of
enzymes within the cornea. This imbalance makes the cornea
more susceptible to oxidative damage from compounds called
free radicals, causing it to weaken and bulge forward.
Risk factors for oxidative damage and weakening of the cornea include a genetic predisposition, explaining why keratoconus often affects more than one member of the same family. Keratoconus is also associated with overexposure to ultraviolet rays from the sun, excessive eye rubbing, a history of
poorly fit contact lenses and chronic eye irritation.
Keratoconus Treatment
In the mildest form of keratoconus, eyeglasses or soft contact
lenses may help. But as the disease progresses and the cornea
thins and becomes increasingly more irregular in shape, glasses
or soft contacts no longer provide adequate vision correction.
Treatments for moderate and advanced keratoconus include:
- Gas permeable contact lenses: If eyeglasses or soft contact
lenses cannot control keratoconus, then rigid gas permeable
(RGP) contact lenses are usually the preferred treatment. Their
rigid lens material enables RGP lenses to vault over the cornea, replacing the corneas irregular shape with a smooth,
uniform refracting surface to improve vision.
But RGP contact lenses can be less comfortable to wear than
a soft lens. Also, fitting contact lenses on a keratoconic cornea
is challenging and time-consuming. You can expect frequent
return visits to fine-tune the fit and the prescription, especially
if the keratoconus continues to progress.
- "Piggybacking" contact lenses: Because fitting a gas permeable contact lens over a cone-shaped cornea can sometimes
be uncomfortable for the individual with keratoconus, some
eye care practitioners advocate "piggybacking" two different
types of contact lenses on the same eye. For keratoconus, this
method involves placing a soft contact lens, such as one made
of silicone hydrogel, over the eye and then fitting a GP lens
over the soft lens. This approach increases wearer comfort
because the soft lens acts like a cushioning pad under the
rigid GP lens.
- Hybrid contact lenses: Hybrid contact lenses have a relatively
new design that combines a highly oxygen-permeable rigid
center with a soft peripheral "skirt." Manufacturers of these
lenses claim hybrid contacts provide the crisp optics of a GP
lens and wearing comfort that rivals that of soft contact lenses. Hybrid lenses are also available in a wide variety of parameters to provide a fit that conforms well to the irregular shape
of a keratoconic eye.
- Intacs: (Addition Technology, Des Plaines, Ill.) Intacs or corneal inserts received FDA approval for treating keratoconus in
August 2004. These tiny plastic inserts are placed just under
the eye's surface in the periphery of the cornea and help re-shape the cornea for clearer vision. Intacs may be needed
when keratoconus patients no longer can obtain functional
vision with contact lenses or eyeglasses.
- Boston Scleral Lens Prosthetic Device (BSLPD): This cone-shaped device resembles a large contact lens and works partly
by maintaining a "pool" of fluid on the eyes surface through
which light rays pass and are bent to achieve proper focus.
Rather than resting on the eyes clear surface or cornea, however, the lens makes contact with the "white" or sclera of the
eye. The device was FDA-approved in 1994.
- C3-R: (Boxer Wachler Vision, Los Angeles) Another new procedure for treating keratoconus, known by the brand name of
C3-R (corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin), is a noninvasive method of strengthening corneal tissue to halt bulging
of the eyes surface. In the C3-R procedure, eye drops containing
riboflavin (vitamin B2) are placed on the cornea and are then
activated by ultraviolet (UV) light to strengthen links between
the connective tissue (collagen) fibers within the cornea.
- Corneal transplant: Some people with keratoconus cant tolerate a rigid contact lens, or they reach the point where contact lenses or other therapies no longer provide acceptable
vision. The last remedy to be considered may be a cornea
transplant, also called a penetrating keratoplasty (PK or PKP).
Even after a transplant, you most likely will need glasses or
contact lenses for clear vision.
ONLINE SOURCES FOR MORE INFO ABOUT KERATOCONUS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL AS WELL AS THE PATIENT
All About Vision
Access Media Group LLC
960 Grand Avenue, San Diego, California 92109
www.allaboutvision.com/conditions/keratoconus.htm
American Optometric Association
http://www.aoa.org/x4721.xml
Discovery Eye Foundation
6222 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 260
Los Angeles, CA 90048
Email: ContactUs@DiscoveryEye.org
Digital Journal of Ophthalmology
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Harvard Medical School
243 Charles Street
Boston, MA 02114www.djo.harvard.edu/site.php?url=/patients/pi/425
emedicine (from WebMD)
emedicine.medscape.com/article/1194693-overview
Indiana University
School of Optometry
www.opt.indiana.edu/lowther/keratoconus.htm
The Keratoconus Center
www.keratoconus.com/
National Keratoconus Foundation
6222 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 260
Los Angeles, CA 90048
(800) 521-2524, (310) 623-4466
www.nkcf.org/
US Library of Medicine
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001013.htm
Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keratoconus
References
- Fowler, Craig W MD; Belin, Michael W. MD; Chambers, Wiley A. MD; Contact Lenses in the Visual Correction of Keratoconus, presented at Contact Lens Association of America Mid-Winter Meeting, Las Vegas, 1988.
- Weiner, Barry M. OD; Nirankari, Verinder S. MD; A New Biaspheric Contact Lens for Severe Astigmatism Following Penetrating Keratoplasty; The CLAO Journal, January 1992, Vol. 18, Number 1, Pages 29-33.
- Bennet, Edward S. OD; Grohe, Robert M. OD; Rigid Gas Permeable Contact Lenses, Professional Press Books, Fairchild Publications, New York, NY; 1986. Pages 297-344
|
|
|